Are driver contracts in motor racing to be classified as employment contracts and the drivers therefore as employees?

The legal classification of driver contracts in motor racing is of key importance - not only from a legal perspective, but also from an economic perspective. A question that especially arises is whether a racing driver is an employee or a self-employed service provider. This distinction has far-reaching consequences, for example for social security contributions, protection against dismissal, liability issues and the structure of labour law provisions and principles as a whole.

Employee or self-employed? - The legal bases

Characteristic features of the status of employee are, in particular, integration into the employer's operational organisation and a comprehensive obligation to follow instructions as regards the time, place and content of the work. In contrast, a self-employed person works independently and with an entrepreneurial risk.

In motor racing in particular, however, this distinction is not always clear-cut. Racing drivers are part of a team, wear team clothing, follow racing strategies and fulfil sponsor obligations - all aspects that can indicate a dependent employment relationship. At the same time, many drivers have their own sponsors, bear certain costs themselves and at times decide freely about their racing assignments – indications of self-employment.

A key criterion for classification is the extent to which a driver is bound by instructions. The more the driver is involved in the organisational processes and the less decision-making freedom they have, the more likely this is to indicate employee status. In order to avoid this, driver contracts should be structured in such a way that emphasis is given to the driver's autonomy - for example through their free choice of racing assignments or their independent organisation of trips.

Economic risks in the event of incorrect classification

The risks of incorrect classification are considerable. If a driver who has been classified as self-employed is subsequently classified as an employee, this entails the risk of high back-payments of social security contributions. There may also be late payment penalties, fines and risks under criminal law for withholding social security contributions.

Such classification can also have serious consequences under labour law. For example, employees enjoy the special protection of the German Unfair Dismissals Act (Kündigungsschutzgesetz, KSchG) and are entitled to paid holiday and the continued payment of wages in the event of their illness. This can have considerable operational and financial consequences for the team employing them.

There are also differences in liability law. While employees are generally not personally liable for slight negligence, a self-employed person can be held fully liable in the event of damages - a significant difference in a high-risk environment such as professional motorsport.

Drafting of driver contracts - legal certainty through clear structures

Careful contract drafting is therefore essential. In order to minimise legal risks, driver contracts should clearly indicate that the driver is self-employed. The following contractual provisions, among others, are recommended:

• Clear formulation of self-employed status
• Avoidance of extensive instruction rights by the team
• Assumption of own costs such as travelling expenses, insurance or equipment by the driver
• No fixed integration into operational processes, but rather the free determination of time and place of work
• Possibility to work for third parties

However, it is important to note that not only the wording of the contract is decisive, but also the actual implementation of the collaboration. Even a formally correctly worded contract can be assessed as a case of pseudo self-employment in the context of a social security audit if its practical implementation contradicts this.

Conclusion - individual case assessment and legal support essential

The distinction between employees and self-employed persons in motorsport is complex and always depends on the specific individual case. A general classification is not possible. In order to avoid legal and economic risks, contracts should be individually drafted.

In this respect, we at Oppenhoff have many years of experience in motor racing - including in the DTM, Formula 1 and GT racing series. We would be happy to advise you on the legally compliant drafting of driver contracts and support you in classifying your contractual relationships. Feel free to contact us – we can also help you into the pole position in the legal respect.

Back to list